Want a FREE 1-on-1 or group science intro lesson for your kid? Schedule an info session with us to learn how HERE → (this booking is for an info session — not the lesson itself)
Empower Health Science Lab
Learn · Act · Thrive
All labs
LAB · MIDDLE SCHOOL (6–8)

🩺 Health Literacy and Advocating for Yourself

Step into a hospital simulation. Evaluate conflicting health info, ask doctors questions, and learn to advocate for your own care.

Progress: 0 / 4 stages complete

How to do this lab — read me first!

  1. 1.Take the pre-quiz below. Type your answer into the box for each question — it's okay if you're not sure! This shows what you already know. Spelling doesn't have to be perfect, and CAPS or lowercase both work the same.
  2. 2.Read the lab sections below the quiz — they explain the science in plain words. Tap "Go deeper" on any card for extra info.
  3. 3.Work through each lab module by tapping the bubbles near the top. Read it, then press "Mark module complete" to unlock the next one.
  4. 4.Do the hands-on sorting activity — use the up/down arrows to put the items in the right order, then press Check my order.
  5. 5.Take the post-quiz. It unlocks after you finish everything above. Type your answers in — short answers are fine, just write the main idea.
  6. 6.Sign in to save your scores and earn a badge. No account? You can still explore the whole lab.

💡 Stuck on a question? Scroll back and re-read the section about it, then return and try again. There's no time limit!

📝 Pre-quiz — what do you already know?

✏️ Type your answer in the box. Spelling close enough is OK — UPPER or lower case both work.

1. Health literacy means:

2. Reliable sources are:

3. Advocacy means:

4. Asking questions is:

5. Misinformation is:

6. Good health decisions require:

7. Labels help you:

8. Trusted info is:

9. Health choices should be:

10. Doctors expect patients to:

Sign in first to save this score.

Simulation overview

Students enter a hospital simulation where they act as patients navigating medical conversations with doctors and online health information. They are presented with conflicting sources of health advice and must determine credibility using evidence cues. The lab includes interactive dialogues where students ask questions, clarify diagnoses, and choose whether to trust or reject information. The environment rewards critical thinking, clarity, and communication skills. Over time, students see how advocacy changes health outcomes and decision quality. The simulation reinforces confidence in healthcare interactions.

Lab modules

Work through each module in order. Mark each one complete to unlock the post-quiz.

How to evaluate health information

Bad health information kills people. Vaccine hesitancy, miracle cures, fad diets — most started with a real-looking source. Learn the cues that separate evidence from noise.

The evidence hierarchy

Not all sources are equal.

  • · Systematic reviews & meta-analyses (highest)
  • · Randomized controlled trials
  • · Cohort & case-control studies
  • · Case reports & expert opinion
  • · Anecdotes & testimonials (lowest)

Red flags in health claims

  • · ‘Doctors hate this!’
  • · Single dramatic before/after
  • · ‘Big Pharma is hiding it’
  • · No mechanism, just results
  • · Wants to sell you something
Go deeper

Real medicine has uncertainty, side effects, and contraindications. Anything that claims 100% effective with zero downsides is selling, not informing.

Trustworthy sources

  • · CDC, WHO, NIH, peer-reviewed journals
  • · University medical centers
  • · Cochrane Library (meta-reviews)
  • · Healthline (when citing primary sources)

📖 Case study: Wakefield & MMR

A 1998 paper falsely linked MMR vaccine to autism — based on 12 children, no controls, and conflicts of interest. It was retracted in 2010. The misinformation persists; measles outbreaks continue.

Takeaway: A single bad paper can damage public health for decades.

Key takeaways from this module

  • Evidence has a hierarchy — anecdotes are at the bottom.
  • Look for primary evidence, not just claims.
  • Real medicine acknowledges uncertainty.
  • Misinformation can persist long after retraction.

Hands-on activity: Evaluating a health claim

Order the steps for checking whether a viral health TikTok is trustworthy.

  1. 1.Compare to public-health consensus
  2. 2.Identify the source (who?)
  3. 3.Look for cited studies
  4. 4.Check credentials/expertise
  5. 5.Decide & share responsibly

Post-quiz locked

Finish all 4 lab modules (0/4 done). Complete the hands-on activity above.